If you wish to unsubscribe, do so, but please don't be mean and complain or mark as spam! There are always one or two, now and then that will but rest assure; we will NOT lose sleep over those who do anyway, becausethis bulletin board is directed towards the educated, the concerned and those who who wish to be informed of the world that is crumbling before their eyes.
Also you may want to white-list your e-mail settings so that thesenewsletters do not end up in your spam folder.
(If you are a regular reader of our bulletin board, parts written in yellow appears on all issues of this bulletin.)
The World as we see it- As the CHP communique below mentions our Canadian military bases are being turned into refugee camps as you read this article.
Since the majority of these migrants are Muslim young man, which are soon to be flooded into the country by the thousands and with so many reports worldwide of violence from beheading, to suicide bomb attacks and the destruction World Trade Centre and the more recent Paris attacks, the question many are asking is ' Is Islam a peaceful religion'?
You be the judge...!
Click on the video below and read the following passages from the Quran itself, which can be found with a quick google search.
Source of information is from this website.
Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing... but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun(the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)" (Translation is from the Noble Quran)
(The verse prior to this (190) refers to "fighting for the cause of Allah those who fight you" leading some to believe that the entire passage refers to a defensive war in which Muslims are defending their homes and families. The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, however, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries. In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did). Verse 190 thus means to fight those who offer resistance to Allah's rule (ie. Muslim conquest). The use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is disingenuous (the actual Arabic words for persecution - "idtihad" - and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the verse). The word used instead, "fitna", can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation. This is certainly what is meant in this context since the violence is explicitly commissioned "until religion is for Allah" - ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.)
Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."
Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not."
(Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.)
Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."
Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority".
(This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining companions to Allah').
Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward."
(The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter. These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah. This is the theological basis for today's suicide bombers.)
Quran (4:76) - "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…"
Quran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks."
Quran (4:95) - "Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allahhas preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home).Unto each, Allah has promised good (Paradise), but Allah has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward "
(This passage criticizes "peaceful" Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah's eyes. It also demolishes the modern myth that "Jihad" doesn't mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle. Not only is this Arabic word (mujahiduna) used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption. (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man's protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad, which would not make sense if it meant an internal struggle).
Quran (4:104) - "And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain..." Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?
Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement" Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"
(No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.)
Quran (8:15) - "O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey's end."
Quran (8:39) - "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion is all for Allah"
(Some translations interpret "fitna" as "persecution", but the traditional understanding of this word is not supported by the historical context (See notes for 2:193). The Meccans were simply refusing Muhammad access to their city during Haj. Other Muslims were allowed to travel there - just not as an armed group, since Muhammad had declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction. The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, since it was Muhammad's intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did). Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until "religion is only for Allah", meaning that the true justification of violence was the unbelief of the opposition. According to the Sira (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 324) Muhammad further explains that "Allah must have no rivals.") Quran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember."
Quran (8:67) - "It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land..."
Quran (8:59-60) - "And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah's Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy."
Quran (8:65) - "O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight..."
Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them."
(According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence is to convert to Islam (prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion's Five Pillars). This popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under attack. Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even during the sacred months). The historical context is Mecca after the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posedno threat. Once the Muslims had power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not convert.)
Quran (9:14) - "Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people."
(Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his punishment and even "healing" the hearts of Muslims.)
Quran (9:20) - "Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah's way are of much greater worth in Allah's sight.
(These are they who are triumphant." The Arabic word interpreted as "striving" in this verse is the same root as "Jihad". The context is obviously holy war.)
Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."
("People of the Book" refers to Christians and Jews. According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status. Verse 9:33 tells Muslims that Allah has charted them to make Islam "superior over all religions." This chapter was one of the final "revelations" from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad's companions managed to conquer two-thirds of theChristian world in the next 100 years. Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.)
Quran (9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!"
Quran (9:38-39) - "O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place."
(This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell.)
Quran (9:41) - "Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew." See also the verse that follows (9:42) - "If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them"
(This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another country and on Christian soil, in this case, according to the historians).
Quran (9:73) - "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination."
(Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that unbelievers are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter. It also explains why today's devout Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith.)
Quran (9:88) - "But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper."
Quran (9:111) - "Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme."
(How does the Quran define a true believer?)
Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."
Quran (17:16) - "And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utterdestruction."
(Note that the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is "utter destruction." (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden first issued Americans an invitation to Islam).
Quran (18:65-81) -
(This parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion. The story (which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source) tells of Moses encountering a man with "special knowledge" who does things which don't seem to make sense on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation. One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74). However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would "grieve" his parents by "disobedience and ingratitude." He was killed so that Allah could provide them a 'better' son. (Note: This is one reason why honor killing is sanctioned by Sharia. Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Saliq) says that punishment for murder is not applicable when a parent or grandparent kills their offspring (o.1.1-2).)
Quran (21:44) - "We gave the good things of this life to these men and their fathers until the period grew long for them; See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?"
Quran (25:52) - "Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness..."
("Strive against" is Jihad - obviously not in the personal context. It's also significant to point out that this is a Meccan verse.
Quran (33:60-62) - "If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter."
(This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered "merciless" and "horrible murder" in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to "fight in the way of Allah" (3:167) and hence don't act as Muslims should), those with "diseased hearts" (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and "alarmists" or "agitators who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad's biographers. It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today's terrorists do. If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah's eternal word to Muslim generations.)
Quran (47:3-4) - "Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord... So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)... If it had been Allah's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost."
(Those who reject Allah are to be killed in Jihad. The wounded are to be held captive for ransom. The only reason Allah doesn't do the dirty work himself is to to test the faithfulness of Muslims. Those who kill pass the test.)
Quran (47:35) - "Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: "have the upper hand") for Allah is with you,"
Quran (48:17) - "There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom."
(Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means 'spiritual struggle.' Is so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted? This verse also says that those who do not fight will suffer torment in hell.)
Quran (48:29) - "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves" Islam is not about treating everyone equally.
(This verse tells Muslims that there are two very distinct standards that are applied based on religious status. Also the word used for 'hard' or 'ruthless' in this verse shares the same root as the word translated as 'painful' or severe' to describe Hell in over 25 other verses including 65:10, 40:46 and 50:26..)
Quran (61:4) - "Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way"
(Religion of Peace, indeed! The verse explicitly refers to "battle array" meaning that it is speaking of physical conflict.)
This is followed by (61:9): "He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist." (See next verse, below). Infidels who resist Islamic rule are to be fought. Quran (61:10-12) - "O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment. That you believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know! (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of'Adn- Eternity ['Adn(Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success."
(This verse refers to physical battle in order to make Islam victorious over other religions (see above). It uses the Arabic word, Jihad.)
Quran (66:9) - "O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end." The root word of "Jihad" is used again here.
(The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include "hypocrites" - those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as such. Other verses calling Muslims to Jihad can be found here at AnsweringIslam.org
So, I ask you, 'Is Islam a religion of piece"?
Please, before flooding me with e-mails, I am merely re-posting what is already plastered all over the internet. Refer to the sources listed at the beginning of this section.
Taxes- You can now find us, or the nearest tax preparer, bookkeeper, CPA or CFP on the websitewww.taxes.caIf you have any question feel free to call or e-mail with any tax questions you may email@example.com.
The video below describes the America monetary system, but I can assure you that the Canadian system works the same way under different labels.
Instead of The Federal Reserve Bank which is privately owned, we have *The Bank of Canada, where a Governor is appointed for a seven-year term, and can be dismissed by the government. In case of a profound disagreement between the government and the Bank, the Minister of Finance can issue written instructions for the Bank to change its policies.
This has never actually happened in the history of the Bank to date.
In practice, the Governor sets monetary policy independently of the government. Canadian banknotes are signed by the governor and deputy governor of the Bank of Canada.
A slightly better monetary system (nationally), but it is still controlled by thesame people, (global bankers) and operated pretty much the same way.
- If you take the time to read the third article of this newsletter, put out by the CHP, you will find that our Military bases are being turned into refugee camps as we speak, for thousands of migrant refugees made up of entirely of Muslim descent.
They are to be equipped with make shift mosques and free books of the Quran, paid entirely with YOUR tax dollars.
The evidence is clear why CRA has created the 'Especial Assessment program' last year. Designed to assess your income tax returns and rob you of your deduction for the last 3 years.
The reasons my friends, is that someone has to pay to feed and house these incoming migrants and that someone is YOU. It is as clear as crystal. The writing on the wall is staring at you in the face.
Did you ever wonder why that most of the rich and civilized countries of the world are being forced to take in hundreds of thousands of migrants, all of which are from Muslim countries? Enough to populate a country of their own? While Christians and other faiths are slaughtered worldwide without government intervention or mention in the news?
Think for a minute, what is the biggest religion in the world.....?
Now, which religion is predominantly anti-Christian.....?
Now what happens when they are allowed to mix? Guess what is going to happen? Its like mixing phosphorous and water.... Kaboom....!
Can you say, population control? But this little flawed plan will back fire on their sorry butts, somewhere down the road.
What does all this have to do with taxes?
Doesn't it make warm and fuzzy, knowing that all that heavy burden, which is rapidly approaching in the horizon, is to be paid with your hard earned tax dollars. Where are they going to get it? Keep your eyes on your pay stubs and returns.
The Quran's, the food, the monetary allowances being reserved to pay for such things as clothing and cell phones, medical expenses and shelter. While disabled and elderly Canadians are and have been surviving on less than $1200 a month.
Expect more harassment from CRA and expect to be paying higher taxes as the price of everything is about to skyrocket.
Christian Heritage Party Communique?
Vicki Gunn - Executive Director of the Christian Heritage Party
CHP Communiqué Vol 23, Issue 05, Feb 02, 2016
Is Truth "Non-negligible"?
It’s a non-negligible amount of work to read the news sometimes. There’s not only watching for media bias and looking for “the spin,” there’s also watching for misleading words that misdirect us as to various mis-implications in the article.
It’s just over three years since the story broke about 491 babies surviving abortion and left to die. It triggered this CHP article.
Did the practice of infanticide end in 2013? Obviously not! This article from LifesiteNews tells of the continued practice of killing the live babies born after botched abortions. “The authors complain that the death of abortion survivors has a “non-negligible” upward impact on Quebec’s infant mortality rate.”
The article to which they refer is “Abortion and Infant Mortality on the First Day of Life,” written by Nathalie Auger, Marianne Bilodeau-Bertrand, and Reg Sauve. The article also says that late term abortion carries a “non-negligible risk” of the baby being born alive. Perhaps, the numbers of aborted babies left to die is greater than is reported.
Canadians have evolved though in how they perceive these types of reports. Prior to 2013, Officials carefully placed their fingers in their ears to avoid hearing whistle blowers while many of the Canadian electorate stood united behind their elected officials…ears carefully plugged.
In 2013, when the story broke of the StatsCan report that 491 babies were born alive and left to die between 2000-2009, The Interim also reported “According to numbers from the Canadian Institute for Health Information, another 199 babies were left to die after surviving abortions in 2010 and 2011.” Three MPs sought RCMP involvement by writing a letter seeking an RCMP investigation.
Of course, with that valiant flare of activity, the media and pro-aborts promptly went into damage control. We can’t have a little matter of 698 murdered babies messing up something as important as sex without consequences.
It’s all about “the spin”… Equate it with abortions; hide the fact that, even under Canadian law, killing a live infant is murder; yell really loud about denied rights; and tap into people’s emotions. This is a winning formula to make infanticide acceptable…or any other immoral behaviour you want to normalize.
So what does this latest information to come out tell us about our Canadian worldview? We’re still careful about “the spin.” Rather than say that reporting babies born alive and left to die as having a “significant” effect on our infant mortality rates, those completing this study hid behind the “double negative” to disguise the truth.
Again, it’s a lot of work to read the news sometimes…Translation…“Non-negligible” = “Significant.” Our brain remembers that “negligible” was what the article said. We must discern a little more to catch, what was frowned upon by our English teachers, the “double negative” that manipulated our understanding of the results of this study.
Many of us remember the article in the Toronto Sun that exposed a webpage on Toronto District School Board (TDSB) website encouraging children to experiment sexually with vegetables. When questioned, what was the TDSB’s spin? They were providing “sexual health information.” The lazy, or trusting, person could read the TDSB statement and applaud the school for providing healthy sexual information. A deeper look at the information would lead one to wonder at the perversions being taught to children.
We have a heritage that values honesty. While our Canadian worldview may change, our Christian worldview does not change. I am so grateful that I have available to me a political party that does not “spin” the truth to hide the truth. Would you join a political party that required high and vigilant levels to discern what they represent?
CHP Canada defends life from conception to natural death. We say that plainly. We would require immigrants to sign a formally binding pledge of loyalty to Canada. The Christian Heritage Party of Canada would allow the federal government to enter into debt only in cases of national crisis. These are just a few of the unequivocal positions of CHP Canada.
You can access more Better Solutions here.
If our generations won’t stand up for truth today, truth will be an increasingly rare commodity in our public life tomorrow. If we won’t discern and confront “the spin,” then we will not recognize the truth.
To support honesty in government and Better Solutions for Canada, join your voice with ours by being part of the solution to burying the truth.
Quick Links Christian Heritage Party website Donate Now Contact Us Tel: 1-888-868-3247 Fax: 819-281-7174
Rod Taylor - Leader of the Christian Heritage Party
CHP Communiqué Vol 23, Issue 06, Feb 09, 2016
Calling Evil Good and Good Evil
Shakespeare’s famous line, “A rose by any other name would smell as sweet,” may be true as regards the perception of our physical world by our senses but the descriptive terms used to categorize human behaviours certainly affect our attitudes towards those being described.
TV advertisers know this. So do news anchors, lobbyists, and politicians. So-called “reproductive rights” are more easily defended than “taxpayer-funded abortions.” And,“investment in our children’s future” sounds way better than “deficit spending.”
Here are a few of the phrases being thrown around that are shaping public opinion and encouraging—or allowing—bad public policies to be enacted with minimum resistance:
“Gender equality” in schools means the imposition of false and deceptive teaching on impressionable schoolchildren regarding their own God-given sexual identity.
“Separation of church and state” seems like an innocuous intent to create fairness. Instead it has been used to suppress public expressions of Christian faith.
“Caring for the planet” is presumed by the public to mean opposition to all pipelines, power plants, and mines. Those who believe mankind can develop resources while caring for the planet are deemed to be greedy corporate apologists.
Those who have studied world history know the emptiness of Neville Chamberlain’s triumphant declaration in September 1938 that he had achieved “peace for our time” as he brandished the so-called Munich Agreement he had signed with Hitler. It should be troubling to us—knowing what we do now—to recall Chamberlain’s soothing words to his countrymen in 1938 to “go home and get a nice quiet sleep.” Less than a year after that “historic agreement” Hitler’s forces crossed into Poland and plunged Europe into the Second World War. The words on paper and the signatures proved to be hollow and meaningless but they kept Britain out of the way for a crucial year while Hitler consolidated his position. In the ensuing conflict, over 60 million men, women, and children died. It matters whose words and what words we believe.
Words can be used to convey reality or they can be used to deceive, exploit, manipulate, and to falsely accuse. We Christians today must also be prepared to be maligned and to have our words and our actions misrepresented to our fellow citizens who—I’m sure—truly desire “peace in our time.” They desire, as we do, safe city streets, prosperous industry, and fruitful harvests. They desire an end to the strife and hostility of the “culture wars.”
Unfortunately, so many of them are receiving only biased and misleading reports. They do not hear from the national media about the imprisonment of peaceful pro-life protesters. They do not hear from the national media or from the government about the spread of disease and dysfunction among the “gay community.” They do not hear about the “slippery slope” that follows in the wake of legalized euthanasia and assisted suicide—the killing of the elderly in Holland and Belgium without their consent. They do not hear about the abortion-breast cancer link, information that could save many lives.
Today, those who defend the sanctity of life are said to be “against a woman’s right to choose.” Those who believe that parents—not the state—should be setting moral standards for their own children are called “homophobic bigots.”
In Texas, the undercover videographers who exposed and documented for the world the shocking sale of the body parts of aborted babies are now themselves the victims of a “justice system” gone amuck. Those chopping little babies into parts and selling their hearts, spines, kidneys, and brains continue in their grisly business, unmolested by the courts. Those who bravely entered into that bloody domain to obtain evidence are the ones on trial, with prison sentences and massive fines hanging over their heads.
In Canada, we have become familiar with “anti-bullying” campaigns. The real bullies, hiding behind phrases like “keeping our children safe in schools,” are forcing children, parents, teachers, and even Christian school boards and trustees to implement policies that are contrary to God’s laws, natural function, common sense, and decency. They are imposing—in province after province—graphic and age-inappropriate teaching about sexuality and gender identity.
May God give to us wisdom and grace to defend life, marriage, and freedom in the face of false accusations, misleading media, and false reports. God wants us to understand the world we live in and to make informed decisions and righteous judgments. He says: “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil!” We are commanded to “speak the truth in love” and we do so now. Individuals can be forgiven and restored and so can nations. “They shall know the truth and the truth shall make them free.” We encourage each of you to be “proclaimers of truth” to this generation.
The Christian Heritage Party of Canada will not move the standard; evil is evil and good is good! We will not say otherwise. We need you to join your voice with our voices. The more voices speaking, the louder the message that will be sent. Join CHP Canada today. If you are already a member, we need your financial assistance and your energy joined with our energy.
Quick Links Christian Heritage Party website Donate Now Contact Us Tel: 1-888-868-3247 Fax: 819-281-7174
Rod Taylor - Leader of the Christian Heritage Party
February 12, 2016
Separation of Mosque and State
As I write this, Canada—under the direction of our new Prime Minister— is hurriedly preparing to welcome Syrian refugees by the tens of thousands and Canadian military bases are being turned into domestic refugee camps. Muslim prayer mats and Korans are being purchased by Canadian taxpayers for use on the bases and plans are being made to build “worship centers”, known in the real world as mosques.
The pomp and circumstance of all this panicked generosity is to present Canada as a “caring nation” and to show the depths of compassion and concern we have for the struggling and destitute. How long can such a fantasy be sustained? While military personnel—heretofore given their due respect as defenders of our nation—are being turned out of their lodgings to accommodate this wave of “instant immigrants”, our men and women in uniform abroad are being called off of their mission in Syria where they have been trying to defend the homes and cities from which these refugees are fleeing. Rather than defending the right of these people to exist and to remain in their own country, Canada now offers the “consolation prize” of a new life in Canada, even if we must throw caution to the wind and suspend our own military preparedness to do so.
Of course it must be pointed out that our PM does nothing to protect the most vulnerable and defenseless among us. On our shores, far from the front lines in Syria, approximately 100,000 Canadian babies are killed each year, a practice he strongly supports. If they were allowed to be born, each of them would already have a home. They would not require translators or ESL classes. They would not need taxpayer-funded Korans. They would not displace our military. About 274 are killed every day and our PM shows no concern.
In the blur of the “Syrian refugee crisis” the starving masses of South Sudan—many of them Christians—have not been mentioned. The UN estimates that over a million are on the verge of starvation and at least 40,000 will die imminently unless they receive aid. Persecuted Christians are being killed by the thousands and driven from their homes in North Korea, Eritrea, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia and Libya, to name but a few countries and mostly in the name of Islam. There are literally millions of refugees in the world. We know we cannot help them all but why are Syrian refugees singled out as the “poster child” recipients of Canadian compassion?
The shocking travesty of Canadians being forced to fund a foreign religion can hardly be comprehended. Our own Christian heritage is mocked or ignored and the name of our God, whose values have been the foundation and guide of our great civilization, is often excluded from the public sphere. Yet Canadians are expected to sacrifice not only to provide food and shelter for the refugees but even to promote and encourage the practice of Islam on our military bases. Since when did Canada become responsible for the promotion of any religion?
The withdrawal of our fighter jets from the front-lines in Syria can only be seen as a defeat. To pretend that sending a few specialized units to train beleaguered nationals is “another way” of defeating ISIS is folly. We are either committed participants in the desperate struggle to defeat the many-headed horror of terrorism or we are casual observers. History will not be so kind as the liberal media in assessing this unnecessary retreat and the self-absorbed distraction of our ill-conceived refugee response. The CHP calls on the government to renew the battle against ISIS with vigour, to defend Syrian villagers in their own homeland and to stop the madness of mass, ill-vetted refugee importation.
Quick Links Christian Heritage Party website Donate Now Contact Us Tel: 1-888-868-3247 FREE Fax: 819-281-7174
Book of the Week
"Following Jesus without Denominationalism"
1. In our previous lesson, I began this series by defining the terms denomination and denominationalism... a. "denomination" - a group of congregations that are joined together under some governing body, that effectively serves to distinguish and divide them from other congregations b. "denominationalism" - advocacy of separation into religious denominations 2. I also suggested three reasons why "denominationalism" is wrong... a. It is un-scriptural (i.e., without scriptural support) b. It is anti-scriptural (e.g., Jn 17:20-23; 1 Co 1:10-13; 3:3-4) c. It is harmful to the cause of Christ (by discouraging people from believing in Christ - Jn 17:21) 3. But is it possible for people today to simply be Christians, without being a member of any man-made denomination? a. The answer is "Yes!" b. Indeed, by following the example of Jesus Himself, we can be members of His body, the Lord's church, just as we read about in the scriptures!
Please send me an e-mail and request this book, its free and there is no catch. firstname.lastname@example.org
Facebook- You can find us athttps://www.facebook.com/pauljsduarteor Shakedown -https://www.facebook.com/DrPaulDuarte Is The Income Tax System Legal -https://www.facebook.com/pages/Is-The-Income-Tax-System-Legal/121482341368459
This week on Idiocracy - I don't know if you have noticed, but if you have a look around you, the world seems to be getting dumber by the day. Peoples IQ has dropped dramatically in the past 10 years (look it up). I don't know if it is due to chemtrails, the water, the GMO's and chemicals in our food, the education system or all the above. But something is definitely happening to people around the globe. So we have decided to ad this little fun piece, named after the movie Idiocracy, entitled "This week in idiocracy".
If you have any idiocratic stories you want to share with us, e-mail them to us and we will post it in the following week's newsletter.
This week on idiocracy
- In this particular article, we did know if we should have placed it on the 'World as we see it section or here. But the lunacy behind it, merits that we should call it shear idiocracy, especially being a disabled man myself.
The following is part of a letter, from the Free Methodist Church in Canada (Barrie, ON).
The Supreme Court of Canada has given the federal government a 4 month extension to pass the "Assisted Dying Law" . Original deadline was Feb 6, 2016. The Supreme Court of Canada ruled that Canada’s long-standing law against physician-assisted suicide (euthanasia) was unconstitutional in cases where a competent adult has clearly consented to the termination of life, and has a “grievous medical condition that causes them enduring, intolerable suffering.” The Supreme Court has given Parliament twelve months to enact new legislation consistent with this ruling.
What’s at Stake?
Our concern is that lifting the ban on physician assisted suicide undermines the worth and dignity of all people as made in the Image of God, regardless of one’s age, wellness, abilities or physical/mental capacity. We are further concerned that this ruling may open the way to situations where people consent to physician assisted suicide because of depression, cognitive impairment or outside manipulation, where they otherwise wouldn’t. We also wish to protect doctors from situations where they may be required to assist in ending someone’s life, or making a referral to that effect, against their own conscience.
We are calling on parliament to draft this legislation with the most stringent safeguards as possible, to ensure that physician assisted deaths are a rare exception, rather than a commonly available option for terminal illness. We are also urging them to make effective palliative care and end-of-life pain-management a primary concern.
The Response we are hoping for:
· for our leaders in government who have the responsibility of law-making. · for the Supreme Court of Canada who have made this ruling. · for doctors who are called upon to treat people suffering grievous illness or chronic pain. · for hospice workers, chaplains, palliative care nurses and all those who care for the sick and the dying. · for those whose suffering or illness is so profound that they see no other hope than to request help in ending their life. Pray God’s mercy, wisdom and guidance for them.
Thanks for your help with this.
Contents of Attached Document:
Dear See below for proper letter writing protocol
In recent months, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that Canada’s long-standing prohibition against physician-assisted suicide is unconstitutional in cases where “a competent adult person (1) has clearly consented to the termination of life; and (2) has a grievous and irremediable medical condition that causes enduring suffering that is intolerable to the individual.” As we understand it, the Supreme Court has given Parliament twelve months to respond by enacting legislation consistent with the constitutional parameters set out in its ruling.
We, the undersigned, are writing to you on behalf of [your church’s name], a congregation of the Free Methodist Church in Canada, to express our commitment to the fundamental sanctity of human life and the consequent worth of all persons. We reject the idea that some lives are not worth living or that chronic disease or diminished physical capacity somehow diminishes the value of a life. While we understand the Supreme Court’s position that an absolute prohibition of physician assistance to hasten death is unjust, we are extremely concerned that the legalization of physician-assisted suicide could serve to undermine a commitment to the sanctity of human life and call into question the dignity and worth of all persons. We are especially concerned that lifting the prohibition against physician-assisted suicide may present a serious risk for those in our society that are already vulnerable, such as the elderly or those whose mental capacities have been compromised.
We therefore respectfully urge you, as our elected representative, to make every effort to see that Parliament prepares a legislative response to this Supreme Court ruling which duly emphasizes the sanctity of human life and the worth of all persons. In particular, we call on the government to draft legislation that: 1) includes stringent safeguards to ensure that the practice of physician-assisted suicide is an exceptional rather than a commonly available option for terminal illness; 2) defines terms like “competence,” “consent” and “intolerability” with such clarity and specificity that it prevents situations where people may consent to physician-assisted suicide because of depression, cognitive impairment, or outside coercion or manipulation; and 3) protects physicians from situations where they would be compelled against their conscience either to assist in ending someone’s life or to refer their patients to a doctor willing to do so.
We further call on the government to do all it can to ensure that the Canadian health care system is providing the best possible palliative care and fully-adequate pain management to all who require it. As a Christian denomination ministering in Canada for over 130 years, the Free Methodist Church has a long history of providing care, compassion, and support for the suffering and the dying. Our parish ministers, chaplains and dedicated lay-people have walked with people through chronic disease, disability and terminal illness, consistently bearing witness to our conviction that human life can have dignity and purpose, even in the face of pain and suffering. Our sincere belief is that the value and worth of human life rests primarily in our relationship with a God whose love sustains us throughout life, even to the end.
On behalf of the members of our Free Methodist congregation, we thank you for your dedication in serving the interests and needs of your constituency. We regularly pray for you as our representative in Parliament. May Almighty God give you wisdom as you respond to this urgent and complex issue. Prayerfully,
Rev. ____________ Pastor _______________ Chair, Official Board
cc names of other officials in your locality to whom you are copying this letter. See below
The Prime Minister
The Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, P.C., M.P. Prime Minister of Canada The House of Commons Parliament Buildings Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0A6
Dear Mr. Trudeau,
The Minister of Justice
The Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould P.C., M.P. The Minister of Justice The House of Commons Parliament Buildings Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0A6
Dear Ms. Wilson-Raybould,
Your Member of Parliament MPs are addressed as follows, when writing:
Cabinet Ministers: The Honourable Jane Smith, PC, MP (Note: PC denotes that they are members of the Privy Council)
Other Members of Parliament: Ms Jane Smith, MP
For your MP’s postal and email addresses, checkwww.parl.gc.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members
Online Endorsement of the Joint Statement made by the EFC and the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops: I urge you to read and sign the joint statement on euthanasia and assisted suicide made by the EFC and the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops.
- With all that you read so far about refugee's, what the Quran has to say about infidel's (anyone that is not muslim, but mostly Christian and Jews) - our snotty nosed and ignorant PM is ignoring what is happening in Sweden and Germany, public protest, be headings, violence in Paris and the World Trade Centre to list only a few; and is still going ahead with his superiors (the global elite) and their plan to bring down a once proud and free country.
So, on that note lock up your ladies and pack up your babies. The world as you know it, is about to get rough.